Obama gives pass: NO TOUCH MUSLIMS' JUNK

Don't believe it?

Here's the link: http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/30028

" However, Muslim women will not have to face such worries. CNSNews.com has reported that Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) — which is frequently tied to domestic terror plots — has been guaranteed that TSA officials will only pat down Muslim women in the head and neck area. " (emphasis and colour added)

Want more?

" Muslim women will likely opt for the not-very-invasive security pat-down, because most consider airports’ high-image body scans a violation of Islamic Shari’a law. CNS News adds, “In February, the Figh Council of North America, a group of Islamic scholars, issued a fatwa, or religious ruling, that full-body scanners violate Islamic law.” " (link is theirs and is left intact)

So, if you're a Muslim, you don't have to worry.

Now let's see ...

" Luckily, Muslim terrorists have no history of using female suicide bombers or hiding explosives in their underwear.

Consider this just another reason why one-in-four Americans believe Obama is a Muslim. " (links are theirs and are left intact.)

Now how about it, Ms Clownitano?

TSA LIED ... KIDS DIED!! No, nobody died.

But the TSA did lie, didn't they?

Remember when this was written:

" Since the rollout of the imaging scanners there has been controversy over the quality of the images, which show limited details of a person’s entire body, and the possible saving of the images – something TSA has denied is possible. " (emphasis and colour added)

The article is here: http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/nov/15/tsa-probe-scan-resistor/

But remember that Gizmodo article? "One Hundred Naked Citizens: One Hundred Leaked Body Scans" You can find it here: http://gizmodo.com/5690749/

Well, it turns out that this isn't the first time that the TSA has been caught in an outright lie. Honestly. We need only to go back to 9-AUG-2010, when this article was written: http://news.spreadit.org/body-scan-images-saved-tsa-full-body-scanners-controversy/

" Body Scan Images Saved: TSA Full Body Scanners Controversy – A Federal agency has announced earlier this month that approximately 35,000 body images have been stored, after being scanned by body scanners. This is after being told by federal agencies this could not and would not happen. (the italicized part is as it was written in the article. The bold colour was added by me.)

Need more? Can we believe anything Ms Clownitano says at this point? http://michellemalkin.com/2010/11/15/clownitano-tsas-credibility-problem/ (I especially like the photoshop that was done of Ms Clownitano.)

I know I'm going to be speaking to the wall here, but Ms Clownitano, do the honourable thing and step down. Immediately. Either that, or come clean about it.

Now waiting for my sister to tell me my heart is filled with hate ...3...2...1...

What a Difference a Day Makes!

Screenshot from yesterday's Drudge Report:

In case you can't read it (it is small, isn't it?) it reads "BIG SIS: 'We have an open ear' ... "

Let's fast forward to today, Tuesday, November 16, 2010:

There are two captions that we're interested in: the first one is big enough to be readable, so I won't repost it. However, it goes here: http://www.prisonplanet.com/tsa-now-putting-hands-down-fliers-pants.html where we learn this:

" The TSA’s invasive new screening measures include officers literally putting their hands down people’s pants if they are wearing baggy clothing in a shocking new elevation of groping procedures that have stoked a nationwide revolt against privacy-busting airport security measures. " But the article goes further: Police State? Read on...

" Speaking with The Alex Jones Show today (video coming soon), Stone went further – noting how the TSA thug directly patted down his testicles, penis and backside while his hand was inside Stone’s pants. Stone was initially embarrassed to reveal the full scope of the groping but related the details of what amounted to nothing less than outright sexual molestation. " (emphasis and colour added)

That should do more than scare the hell out of you. It should make you mad. It should make you want to tell those TSA thugs "HELL NO!" when they try to grope you. (NOTE: Time for that full disclosure thing: When I was living in Texas I applied for a job with the TSA. However, I was never called for an interview and I never worked for them. But I DID apply for a screener job.)

Personally, if some TSA jackboot tries to grope my "family jewels" he'll end up in a shouting match. I do agree that extra security is needed, but this is overboard. GROPING?!? TSA, be sure you investigate me. And the last name is spelled B I R O S H. Think you can manage to spell that correctly? SUUUURE you can!

The second caption that we're interested in reads "UPDATE: Agency to investigate resister..." which leads here: http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/nov/15/tsa-probe-scan-resistor/ where we learn this:

" The Transportation Security Administration has opened an investigation targeting John Tyner, the Oceanside man who left Lindbergh Field under duress on Saturday morning after refusing to undertake a full body scan. "

Yup. Sounds like the Gestapo to me. But something that the TSA a$$hat that anounced the investigation said is just plain wrong. Here's what the article said:

" Since the rollout of the imaging scanners there has been controversy over the quality of the images, which show limited details of a person’s entire body, and the possible saving of the images – something TSA has denied is possible. " (emphasis and colour added)

Oh, really? Read on:

http://gizmodo.com/5690749/

The title of the article? "One Hundred Naked Citizens: One Hundred Leaked Body Scans" (link is theirs and is left intact)

Now how about it, TSA? Care to change your story?

Screenshot: The Terrorists Have Won

In case you can't see the TSA 'agent,' it is a female wearing the headscarf ... frisking a Catholic Nun. Could you imagine the uproar that would happen if a TSA 'agent' wearing a Crucifix had done the searching?

Just asking.

Maxell Corp.

Time for that full disclosure thing: There is no relationship between myself and Maxell Corp. However, I do use their DVD-RWs for backing up files and data.

Some years ago, while I was living in Texas, I purchased a 15 disc spindle of DVD-RWs at my local Wal-Mart. I purchased the RWs because it allows you to write, erase, and re-write. The 15 discs had all been working perfectly until my last attempted backup which was Thursday of last week. And then two of them flatly refused to work. The other 13, however, worked perfectly.

So, I called Maxell's Customer Support centre. I knew the media has a life-time warranty, so I was calling to ask about replacements.

Imagine my surprise when the gentleman I spoke with offered to ship me two discs at no charge, and without my returning the defective ones (which have since been broken into itty-bitty bits and thrown into the garbage.)

The two discs arrived yesterday (Thank you!) and are working perfectly.

Needless to say, the next time I need to purchase recordable media, it'll be Maxell.

Heard on Sean Hannity's Radio Program

I happened to catch part of the Sean Hannity radio program yesterday and today. Part of it because I've been doing other things.

For the past two days, Mr Hannity has been covering what Mr Shabazz said about "killing crackers."

If you remember, I wrote about it on 3-JUN http://gregb1967.blogspot.com/2010/06/mr-obamas-justice-department.html

It's nice to Mr Hannity's covering it. When I first heard it I nearly fell out of my socks!

A one-minute rant

One minute. Counting from now. ::ding::

You know something I really hate?? Unsolicited mail. Yes, US mail as well as the electronic kind. Give me more than 60 sec...

::ding::

Oh, Sez you! ::climbing on the soapbox:: I really hate those "pre-approved" credit offers as well as those "other" offers that are "per-approved."

[Blogspot: "Now just one moment! You said a on..."
[Me: "I lied. Sue me later. I'm gonna climb on my soapbox!"
[Blogspot: "I'm gonna remember you said that!!"
[Me: "I'm sure you will. Now please allow me to post this, OK? I think you might like it too."
[Blogspot: "Are they xxx-rated pictures?"
[Me: "NO!!"
[Blogspot: "Damn you! But say what you wanna say. I'll find some way to get even with you later."
[Me: "I'm sure you will." ]


For instance, it wasn't all that long ago that a cat (yes, a CAT) was "pre-approved" for a credit card. Here's that link: http://www.news.com.au/messiah-the-cat-gets-credit-card-with-4000-limit/story-e6frfkp9-1111112779454

If THAT weren't bad enough, a tree (yes, a TREE) was offered his/her/its own credit card. Here's that link: http://www.snopes.com/business/bank/treecard.asp

Yes, even a DOG was issued his own "pre-approved" card: http://www.goofball.com/news/joke_Dog_Issued_Credit_Card

That should tell you something. But, and now I beg of you, please allow me to ask you a few questions:

Given what I'm about to tell you as a given, please consider the questions in this context:

1) Do the companies that send out unsolicited bulk US mail use recycled paper?
2) Do those companies know how much bulk unsolicited commercial US mail is sent per year?
3) Do those companies know (or care!) how much their unsolicited commercial mail is sent to the dumpster?
4) Do those companies care about how much petrol (gasoline) is used delivering their unwanted mail?

I just thought I'd ask...