An Open Letter to Rep. Dennis Kucinich

Dear Rep. Kucinich;

Mr. Kucinich; for reference, my correspondence with you today will focus on several articles both in newspaper and in Internet form.

Sir, I do realize that I am not in your district, therefore the odds of my actually hearing from you are somewhere along the lines of the LHC (Large Hadron Collider) actually producing a black hole. Yes, it is possible in theory and on paper. However, according to the equations, the odds against this are several hundred trillion to one against. Possible? Yes, in theory. Likely? It could happen but almost certainly not before our universe ends. The equations are complex and (at least to a physicist) beautiful, but they aren’t for the faint of heart. Which leads me to explain why I’m contacting you today.

The next part of my letter to you will reference the article located here: http://www.cleveland.com/open/index.ssf/2011/01/rep_dennis_kucinich_sues_cafet.html

As you can tell, it’s about your suing the cafeteria due to an olive pit in your meal. Mr. Kucinich, if a simple olive pit is going to sideline you, I shudder to think of how you’d react to some of the vitriol that no doubt makes its way into your email box. No doubt, you’d need an entire team of therapists to deal with it … and that is assuming you see it to begin with.

And this is the part that’s going to lead you (or one of your ilk) to possibly plunder my records yet again. I say yet again because it wasn’t only “Joe the Plumber’s” records that were plundered when he dared to question Mr. Obama. I wrote about it on my blog and I’ve no doubt that my records were also plundered. Do I know this and can I prove it? No. To both questions. However, when I dared to confront the AFGE (American Federation of Government Employees) about their ‘tea-bagger’ advert, they sent me to a web site that doesn’t exist (and still doesn’t as of this writing) and then quietly deep-sixed it.

Allow me to level the playing field Mr Kucinich by taking both of your favourite playing cards off the table. These are the race card and the gender card. Here is a link to something I’m now very tired of reposting: http://gregb1967.blogspot.com/2009/08/article-let-them-eat-cake-democrats.html

Those are the facts and they haven’t changed since before the 2008 election. Those two cards are now off the table. I’m now going to mention health care reform, but again, I’m going to level the playing field. Your anti-reform card is off the table as well. Here is that link: http://gregb1967.blogspot.com/2010/06/dissecting-5-facts-about-anti-reform.html

On that posting, I gave Ms Miller three different chances to find one fact that is wrong. Only one. Mr Kucinich, I never heard from her.

But now your three favourite cards are off the table. For review, these are the race card, the gender card, and the anti-health care reform card. You cannot call any of these cards into play.

But I do have a couple of very serious questions for you, Mr Kucinich.

First, did you read the health care reform bill in its entirety?

Second, are you aware that the bill Mr Obama signed does indeed require me to pay to help fund abortions? As a Born-Again Christian (and this is where I take your ‘idiot’ card away … for that see the 5 facts article) I cannot morally agree with this. Again, Mr Kucinich your ‘idiot’ card is off the table.

I’m also going to take away your name-calling card and request that you (and I as well) follow Mr Obama’s call for civility.

Again, for review, your favourite playing cards (race, gender, anti-reform, idiot and name-calling) are off the table. You cannot call them into play.

My next question is are you aware that after 5 years at the same job you’ll be required to purchase the ObamaCare?

Next, are you aware that the bill Mr Obama signed requires me to pay a fine or face jail time unless I purchase the new ObamaCare?

And Mr Kucinich, if Mr Obama’s healthcare bill is so wonderful and will fix so many things and isn’t “onerous” then why has the list of waivers grown to over 700?

Mr Kucinich, I’m going to leave you by quoting from Jack Webb as he played Det. Sgt. Joe Friday in Dragnet.

“That isn’t what you told the investigating officers at the scene, fella.”

“Well, I had to protect myself. You understand, don’tcha?

“I understand that either you lied to the investigating officers or you’re lying to us now. Now how about it?”

“You want the truth, don’t you? Well you’re getting it. The least you could do is try to believe it.”


“You make it kind of hard to buy.”

Now how about it, Mr Kucinich? I await what in all probability will be a long and echoing silence.

Chertoff got sweatheart deal on TSA scanners; Claim

The link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xH-dpkJZiOM

Article: Man arrested after punching TSA screener in Indy

The link: http://www.indystar.com/article/20101117/NEWS02/11170365/Man-arrested-after-punching-Indianapolis-TSA-screener?odyssey=tabtopnewstextCommunities

Here's the really laughable part:

" Jim Fotenos, spokesman for the Transportation Security Agency, said in an airport police report, "Our transportation security officers work on the front lines to protect the nation from a terrorist attack and physical violence against them is shameful. TSA will work with local authorities to see that appropriate action is taken." " (emphasis and colour added)

Apparently, they don't if you're a Muslim woman. Here's that link: http://gregb1967.blogspot.com/2010/11/obama-gives-pass-no-touch-muslims-junk.html

Now let's review.

The United States was attacked on 11-SEPT-2001 by people who crashed planes into the WTC and the Pentagon.

Were these people ... Catholic Nuns? Nope. But you sure can frisk them!!

Were these people ... Boy Scouts? Nope. But you can frisk them too.

Were these people ... Girl Scouts? Nope. But they've gotta be frisked also!

Were these people ... SCREAMING TODDLERS?!? (link: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/sfmoms/detail?entry_id=77140&tsp=1 ) Nope. But they've gotta be frisked!

Can't frisk Muslim women, however.

Obama gives pass: NO TOUCH MUSLIMS' JUNK

Don't believe it?

Here's the link: http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/30028

" However, Muslim women will not have to face such worries. CNSNews.com has reported that Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) — which is frequently tied to domestic terror plots — has been guaranteed that TSA officials will only pat down Muslim women in the head and neck area. " (emphasis and colour added)

Want more?

" Muslim women will likely opt for the not-very-invasive security pat-down, because most consider airports’ high-image body scans a violation of Islamic Shari’a law. CNS News adds, “In February, the Figh Council of North America, a group of Islamic scholars, issued a fatwa, or religious ruling, that full-body scanners violate Islamic law.” " (link is theirs and is left intact)

So, if you're a Muslim, you don't have to worry.

Now let's see ...

" Luckily, Muslim terrorists have no history of using female suicide bombers or hiding explosives in their underwear.

Consider this just another reason why one-in-four Americans believe Obama is a Muslim. " (links are theirs and are left intact.)

Now how about it, Ms Clownitano?

TSA LIED ... KIDS DIED!! No, nobody died.

But the TSA did lie, didn't they?

Remember when this was written:

" Since the rollout of the imaging scanners there has been controversy over the quality of the images, which show limited details of a person’s entire body, and the possible saving of the images – something TSA has denied is possible. " (emphasis and colour added)

The article is here: http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/nov/15/tsa-probe-scan-resistor/

But remember that Gizmodo article? "One Hundred Naked Citizens: One Hundred Leaked Body Scans" You can find it here: http://gizmodo.com/5690749/

Well, it turns out that this isn't the first time that the TSA has been caught in an outright lie. Honestly. We need only to go back to 9-AUG-2010, when this article was written: http://news.spreadit.org/body-scan-images-saved-tsa-full-body-scanners-controversy/

" Body Scan Images Saved: TSA Full Body Scanners Controversy – A Federal agency has announced earlier this month that approximately 35,000 body images have been stored, after being scanned by body scanners. This is after being told by federal agencies this could not and would not happen. (the italicized part is as it was written in the article. The bold colour was added by me.)

Need more? Can we believe anything Ms Clownitano says at this point? http://michellemalkin.com/2010/11/15/clownitano-tsas-credibility-problem/ (I especially like the photoshop that was done of Ms Clownitano.)

I know I'm going to be speaking to the wall here, but Ms Clownitano, do the honourable thing and step down. Immediately. Either that, or come clean about it.

Now waiting for my sister to tell me my heart is filled with hate ...3...2...1...

What a Difference a Day Makes!

Screenshot from yesterday's Drudge Report:

In case you can't read it (it is small, isn't it?) it reads "BIG SIS: 'We have an open ear' ... "

Let's fast forward to today, Tuesday, November 16, 2010:

There are two captions that we're interested in: the first one is big enough to be readable, so I won't repost it. However, it goes here: http://www.prisonplanet.com/tsa-now-putting-hands-down-fliers-pants.html where we learn this:

" The TSA’s invasive new screening measures include officers literally putting their hands down people’s pants if they are wearing baggy clothing in a shocking new elevation of groping procedures that have stoked a nationwide revolt against privacy-busting airport security measures. " But the article goes further: Police State? Read on...

" Speaking with The Alex Jones Show today (video coming soon), Stone went further – noting how the TSA thug directly patted down his testicles, penis and backside while his hand was inside Stone’s pants. Stone was initially embarrassed to reveal the full scope of the groping but related the details of what amounted to nothing less than outright sexual molestation. " (emphasis and colour added)

That should do more than scare the hell out of you. It should make you mad. It should make you want to tell those TSA thugs "HELL NO!" when they try to grope you. (NOTE: Time for that full disclosure thing: When I was living in Texas I applied for a job with the TSA. However, I was never called for an interview and I never worked for them. But I DID apply for a screener job.)

Personally, if some TSA jackboot tries to grope my "family jewels" he'll end up in a shouting match. I do agree that extra security is needed, but this is overboard. GROPING?!? TSA, be sure you investigate me. And the last name is spelled B I R O S H. Think you can manage to spell that correctly? SUUUURE you can!

The second caption that we're interested in reads "UPDATE: Agency to investigate resister..." which leads here: http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/nov/15/tsa-probe-scan-resistor/ where we learn this:

" The Transportation Security Administration has opened an investigation targeting John Tyner, the Oceanside man who left Lindbergh Field under duress on Saturday morning after refusing to undertake a full body scan. "

Yup. Sounds like the Gestapo to me. But something that the TSA a$$hat that anounced the investigation said is just plain wrong. Here's what the article said:

" Since the rollout of the imaging scanners there has been controversy over the quality of the images, which show limited details of a person’s entire body, and the possible saving of the images – something TSA has denied is possible. " (emphasis and colour added)

Oh, really? Read on:

http://gizmodo.com/5690749/

The title of the article? "One Hundred Naked Citizens: One Hundred Leaked Body Scans" (link is theirs and is left intact)

Now how about it, TSA? Care to change your story?

Screenshot: The Terrorists Have Won

In case you can't see the TSA 'agent,' it is a female wearing the headscarf ... frisking a Catholic Nun. Could you imagine the uproar that would happen if a TSA 'agent' wearing a Crucifix had done the searching?

Just asking.