The link: http://www.denverpost.com/ci_12373595
"WASHINGTON — Rick Strandlof, executive director of the Colorado Veterans Alliance and the man most colleagues knew as Rick Duncan, was front and center during the 2008 political campaigns in Colorado. "
There was just one problem: He was never in the military. He had been, however, a patient in a mental hospital in the past.
He supported mostly Democratic candidates, who, of course, lapped it up.
"But there were also plenty of signs during much of the time Strandlof was working on behalf of candidates for anyone watching carefully."
You don't say. Do you notice the pattern here? B. Hussein Obama had problems coming out of his ears. He's spent $800,000 to avoid producing the vault copy of his birth certificate, he is pals with real domestic terrorist Bill Ayers and his wife, he had problems with his ministers ...
And now the article says "...there were also plenty of signs ... for anyone watching carefully."
I guess you could call that a "duh" moment.
Duh. If the Dems can dig up dirt on Joe the Plumber, if the Ohio Dems can pilfer his records ... why the hell can't they properly vett such people? Duh.
(H/T: Drudge Report)
Saturday, May 16, 2009
Article: "Obama Says U.S. Long-Term Debt Load 'Unsustainable.' "
The Link: http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aJsSb4qtILhg&refer=worldwide
"May 14 (Bloomberg) -- President Barack Obama, calling current deficit spending “unsustainable,” warned of skyrocketing interest rates for consumers if the U.S. continues to finance government by borrowing from other countries. " (Links are not mine, but have been left intact.)
No kidding, Mr Obama. It is unsustainable, and here you are adding to it. I'm sorry to quote more from the article, but this next is important:
"Earlier this week, the Obama administration revised its own budget estimates and raised the projected deficit for this year to a record $1.84 trillion, up 5 percent from the February estimate. The revision for the 2010 fiscal year estimated the deficit at $1.26 trillion, up 7.4 percent from the February figure. The White House Office of Management and Budget also projected next year’s budget will end up at $3.59 trillion, compared with the $3.55 trillion it estimated previously. "
Deficit for this year, $1.84 Trillion. That's $1,840,000,000,000.00. That's a lot of money, but that is for only this year. Fiscal year 2010 will be $1.26T (deficit). Oh, and next year's budget will be $3.59T.
But let's switch gears here. I wrote a while back that you'd start seeing things from Imprimis in this blog. And, here we go.
BUT FIRST, here's the blurb: "Permission to reprint in whole or in part is hereby granted, provided the following credit line is used: "Reprinted by permission from Imprimis, a publication of Hillsdale College." (At the end of this posting, I'll give their URL and a way to request your very own free copy of Imprimis.) ((This is the April 2009 edition, Vol 38, No 4.))
From Mark Steyn's article "Live Free or Die!" "After the President unveiled his budget, I heard Americans complain, oh, it's another Jimmy Carter, or LBJ's Great Society, or the new New Deal.
"You should be so lucky. Those nickel-and-dime comparisons barely begin to encompass the wholesale Europeanization that's underway.
"The 44th President's multi-trillion-dollar budget, the first of many, adds more to the national debt than all of the previous 43 presidents combined, from George Washington to George Dubya. [emphasis added]
"The President wants Europeanized health care, Europeanized daycare, Europeanized education, and, as the Europeans have discovered, even with Europeanized tax rates you can't make that math add up.
"In Sweden, state spending accounts for 54% of GDP. In America, it was 34% -- ten years ago. Today, it's about 40%. In four years' time, that number will be trending very Swede-like.
"But forget the money, the deficit, the debt, the big numbers with the 12 zeroes on the end of them. So-called fiscal conservatives often miss the point. The problem isn't the cost. These programs would still be wrong even if Bill Gates wrote a check to cover them each month.
"They're wrong because they deform the relationship between the citizen and the state. Even if there were no financial consequences, the moral and even spiritual consequences would still be fatal. That's the stage Europe's at.
"America is just beginning this process."
That's it. That's very important because a lot of people have been saying this, and we've been called many things for it. But here it comes. Socialism. Is this the "change" you wanted?
That should scare the crap out of you. It should also mobilize you to action. It's past time to get up off the couch and make your voices heard. It's time to kick the pols out of DC ... all of them ... take a broom and sweep it up. It's time to take back our country. As "Benedict" Arlen Specter proved, they're there simply for the money. He knew if he stayed Republican, he'd get his butt kicked in the next election. So to protect his paycheque, he switched.
Is this the change you wanted?
About Imprimis. Imprimis is a publication of Hillsdale College. Hillsdale takes no federal or state monies, so the feds can't tell them what to teach or how to teach it. You can get your very own FREE copy of Imprimis at http://www.hillsdale.edu/. Or, you can email them at imprimis@hillsdale.edu, or by phone at (800) 437-2268.
And again for that full disclosure thing. :) There is no relationship between Hillsdale College and myself, other that I receive Imprimis. They did not ask me to begin quoting from their publication, in fact, I approached them.
(H/T: Drudge Report, Imprimis)
"May 14 (Bloomberg) -- President Barack Obama, calling current deficit spending “unsustainable,” warned of skyrocketing interest rates for consumers if the U.S. continues to finance government by borrowing from other countries. " (Links are not mine, but have been left intact.)
No kidding, Mr Obama. It is unsustainable, and here you are adding to it. I'm sorry to quote more from the article, but this next is important:
"Earlier this week, the Obama administration revised its own budget estimates and raised the projected deficit for this year to a record $1.84 trillion, up 5 percent from the February estimate. The revision for the 2010 fiscal year estimated the deficit at $1.26 trillion, up 7.4 percent from the February figure. The White House Office of Management and Budget also projected next year’s budget will end up at $3.59 trillion, compared with the $3.55 trillion it estimated previously. "
Deficit for this year, $1.84 Trillion. That's $1,840,000,000,000.00. That's a lot of money, but that is for only this year. Fiscal year 2010 will be $1.26T (deficit). Oh, and next year's budget will be $3.59T.
But let's switch gears here. I wrote a while back that you'd start seeing things from Imprimis in this blog. And, here we go.
BUT FIRST, here's the blurb: "Permission to reprint in whole or in part is hereby granted, provided the following credit line is used: "Reprinted by permission from Imprimis, a publication of Hillsdale College." (At the end of this posting, I'll give their URL and a way to request your very own free copy of Imprimis.) ((This is the April 2009 edition, Vol 38, No 4.))
From Mark Steyn's article "Live Free or Die!" "After the President unveiled his budget, I heard Americans complain, oh, it's another Jimmy Carter, or LBJ's Great Society, or the new New Deal.
"You should be so lucky. Those nickel-and-dime comparisons barely begin to encompass the wholesale Europeanization that's underway.
"The 44th President's multi-trillion-dollar budget, the first of many, adds more to the national debt than all of the previous 43 presidents combined, from George Washington to George Dubya. [emphasis added]
"The President wants Europeanized health care, Europeanized daycare, Europeanized education, and, as the Europeans have discovered, even with Europeanized tax rates you can't make that math add up.
"In Sweden, state spending accounts for 54% of GDP. In America, it was 34% -- ten years ago. Today, it's about 40%. In four years' time, that number will be trending very Swede-like.
"But forget the money, the deficit, the debt, the big numbers with the 12 zeroes on the end of them. So-called fiscal conservatives often miss the point. The problem isn't the cost. These programs would still be wrong even if Bill Gates wrote a check to cover them each month.
"They're wrong because they deform the relationship between the citizen and the state. Even if there were no financial consequences, the moral and even spiritual consequences would still be fatal. That's the stage Europe's at.
"America is just beginning this process."
That's it. That's very important because a lot of people have been saying this, and we've been called many things for it. But here it comes. Socialism. Is this the "change" you wanted?
That should scare the crap out of you. It should also mobilize you to action. It's past time to get up off the couch and make your voices heard. It's time to kick the pols out of DC ... all of them ... take a broom and sweep it up. It's time to take back our country. As "Benedict" Arlen Specter proved, they're there simply for the money. He knew if he stayed Republican, he'd get his butt kicked in the next election. So to protect his paycheque, he switched.
Is this the change you wanted?
About Imprimis. Imprimis is a publication of Hillsdale College. Hillsdale takes no federal or state monies, so the feds can't tell them what to teach or how to teach it. You can get your very own FREE copy of Imprimis at http://www.hillsdale.edu/. Or, you can email them at imprimis@hillsdale.edu, or by phone at (800) 437-2268.
And again for that full disclosure thing. :) There is no relationship between Hillsdale College and myself, other that I receive Imprimis. They did not ask me to begin quoting from their publication, in fact, I approached them.
(H/T: Drudge Report, Imprimis)
Thursday, May 14, 2009
Article:
The Link: http://homelandsecurityus.com/?p=2745
I'm only going to quote a bit of this article, but in my opinion this article is a must read. It's also quite long, but it is that important. You're not going to be reading any of this in the MSM since they've decided that you cannot question 'the one.' You simply can't question the Obamessiah.
Does anybody remember my mentioning the Wikipedia article about "Cult of Personality?" Well, here's a screenshot of what the page looked like before it got scrubbed:
I'm only going to quote a bit of this article, but in my opinion this article is a must read. It's also quite long, but it is that important. You're not going to be reading any of this in the MSM since they've decided that you cannot question 'the one.' You simply can't question the Obamessiah.
Does anybody remember my mentioning the Wikipedia article about "Cult of Personality?" Well, here's a screenshot of what the page looked like before it got scrubbed:
As I mentioned, the article has been scrubbed. There has been quite a bit of debate about whether or not it belongs on Wikipedia. I believe there to be more than enough anecdotal evidence to state that there is indeed a Cult of Personality around 'the one.' Of course, you can't mention that on Wikipedia without being labelled a troublemaker ... or worse.
Well, before I get into the article, I need to add this: Mr Obama is not my Messiah. He's not even my messiah with a small "m." In the same vein, he's not my Saviour. He's not even my saviour with a small "s." He's just a man, folks. He's just a man, yet the MSM has made this messianic complex about him. And as you could see from the previous posting where he spoke about his next 100 days, Mr Obama appears to be buying into it.
So now, let's get to the main article that I'll be referencing. As I said, this is a must read ... at least in my opinion. Here's the link again: http://homelandsecurityus.com/?p=2745 The title? "From Anthrax to Zawahiri, searching for answers"
"11 May 2009: Does anything about the events of the last few months strike you as odd? How about the last few years, or the last few decades? If you’ve been paying attention to Western politics and world events, and if you’ve been closely following politics inside the United States and have become thoroughly confused by the policies, actions and responses of the United States, then you will undoubtedly reply “yes” to that question.
"There is an ever growing list of actions, reactions, and policies that just simply don’t make any sense -at least not until they are viewed through the prism of an “alternate reality,” or an agenda of an elite few who are not acting in the best interests of the United States. Such a list would include matters of national security, health and welfare, immigration, and economics. That list would also involve our leaders from both Republican and Democratic sides of the political aisle."
Now I know that somebody out there is going to be saying (or shouting) "another conspiracy theory!" But how many times have I proved that some of these "conspiracy theories" are in fact ... facts? Mr Hagmann and Mr Taylor have their facts straight in this article. Again, the MSM isn't going to be reporting this, they've decided that Mr Obama is their "Messiah."
And at the end of the long, well-written article, we find this:
" So what’s the point in voting? In fact, although the state electors are supposedly committed to vote for the candidate of the party that chose them, nothing in the Constitution requires them to do so. This explains the presence of the Kenyan born Muslim in the White House right now.
" He is an insert, a Manchurian Candidate of sorts that has strict instructions to drive the US into an economic depression that will leave no alternative other than to unite with other countries as one, including Islamic countries. He is the destructor of sovereignty. He is the stripper of civil rights. He is the catalyst by which Muslims can infiltrate the government at all critical levels. This explains his hobnobbing and back slapping with enemies of the United States. He is supposed to be the one that brings everyone together at the Globalist Table, Muslims and non-Muslims alike.
"Beware of this person. Meanwhile, our investigation continues."
Beware of Barack Hussein Obama. He might be the liberal's and the media's "Messiah," but he is not mine.
Remember that song I referenced? "
"And he's [Mr Obama] the reason Mr Lincoln let the slaves go free; And he told Hillary Clinton "Girl you don't know me."
And he chased away Katrina with a wave of his hand; and let the people of New Orleans walk across dry land.
And he could decimate poverty in a single bound; I searched the whole wide world and I finally found
Obamessiah."
More From the White House Correspondents' Dinner
But first, a song on YouTube. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m4zELim7KN0&fmt=18 (The "&fmt=18" forces it into high quality stereo.)
Yes, a song about the Obamessiah.
But to get back to the dinner, what was it the Obamessiah said? " “During the second 100 days, we will design, build and open a library dedicated to my first 100 days.” And: “My next 100 days will be so successful, I will complete them in 72 days. And on the 73rd day, I will rest.” "
Yes, the Obamessiah has spoken. the one has said he can complete 100 days in only 72. He'll rest on the 73rd. Tell me, did the Obamessiah create light? I had thought God did that.
Yes, this is the same dinner where Ms Sykes said that she hopes Rush Limbaugh's kidneys fail. Of course, if anybody were to dare to say that about the Obamessiah... but there I go again, making too much sense.
Yes, a song about the Obamessiah.
But to get back to the dinner, what was it the Obamessiah said? " “During the second 100 days, we will design, build and open a library dedicated to my first 100 days.” And: “My next 100 days will be so successful, I will complete them in 72 days. And on the 73rd day, I will rest.” "
Yes, the Obamessiah has spoken. the one has said he can complete 100 days in only 72. He'll rest on the 73rd. Tell me, did the Obamessiah create light? I had thought God did that.
Yes, this is the same dinner where Ms Sykes said that she hopes Rush Limbaugh's kidneys fail. Of course, if anybody were to dare to say that about the Obamessiah... but there I go again, making too much sense.
Monday, May 11, 2009
"Free Speech for ME, but not for Thee."
Have you noticed that that appears to be the way the Democrats and liberals are behaving? If a Republican or a conservative (a TRUE Conservative, not Juan McAmnesty) were to stand up in front of a college crowd, those "educated" people would shout the speaker out, create a ruckus, and chalk it up to "free speech."
Granted, you might not like what the speaker is saying, but don't they have just as much right to speak?
Consider Wanda Sykes and her "performance" at the White House Correspondents' Dinner. If anybody had said that about his holiness (in his own mind) the Obamessiah, well. The DHS, the OSI (Office of Special Investigations), the NSA, the IRS, the FBI, and the CIA would have been investigating her as being a potential "domestic extremist."
So what did she say? "You know, you might want to look into this Sir, because I think maybe Rush Limbaugh was the 20th hijacker (on Sept 11, 2001) but he was just so strung out on Oxycontin he missed his flight."
Could you imagine a Conservative saying that about the Obamessiah? That Conservative would never get out of legal trouble. Every three-letter government agency would look at our hypothetical Conservative. But Ms. Sykes is a Democrat, and a liberal, so what the hell, right?
But that's not all she said: "Rush Limbaugh 'I hope the country fails' - I hope his kidneys fail, how about that?"
But let's correct this: Mr Limbaugh said that he hopes the Obamessiah's policies fail, something that I also believe he should not have said. Why? Because if they do fail, then this country will be in an even deeper hole than the Obamessiah has dug for us. And yes, that could be taken to mean that Mr Limbaugh hopes the country fails.
But then Ms Sykes says "I hope his [Rush Limbaugh's] kidneys fail, how about that?" Again, she's a liberal Democrat, so what the hell right?
Let's take our hypothetical Conservative saying the same thing. Remember the OKC man who had his anti-Obamessiah sign taken away, and his house searched (with his permission, and the anti-Obamessiah sign was returned later.) What did that man's sign say? "Abort Obama." That could be taken as a death threat, you see. This is something that the Department of Hussein's Sycophants takes very seriously. And if our hypothetical Conservative were to wish the Obamessiah's kidneys would fail...well. Every government agency would investigate our hypothetical person. A new one would be created just to track him (or her.) He or she would get their own satellite.
But Ms Sykes, this liberal democrat, hopes that Mr Limbaugh's kidneys fail. But this is not a death threat, you see? Nor is it wishing Mr Limbaugh ill. She's a liberal Democrat, so what the hell, right?
What the hell, right?
Sen. Kennedy: "Free Speech for everyone, Al; regardless of ideology." "...regardless of ideology." Yes, that stalwart of liberalism, Mr Kennedy himself said that. "...regardless of ideology."
But if a Conservative paints a sign that says "Abort Obama," he gets harassed. If we disagree with the Obamessiah's porkulus, we get labelled "potential extremists."
Free speech? Only if you're a liberal.
HEY - DEPARTMENT OF HUSSEIN'S SYCOPHANTS, INVESTIGATE ME! I'm speaking out against his holiness (in his own mind) the Obamessiah!
And if you don't like it: "Free speech for everyone, Al; regardless of ideology." If you don't like it, well. Remember that movie Major League? It was that one scene inside Lynn's boyfriend's apartment when he tells Tom Berenger's character "Stay away from her (meaning Lynn.)" And Tom Berenger's character replies: "Suck my d*ck."
And I don't mean duck, or deck, or dock.
Granted, you might not like what the speaker is saying, but don't they have just as much right to speak?
Consider Wanda Sykes and her "performance" at the White House Correspondents' Dinner. If anybody had said that about his holiness (in his own mind) the Obamessiah, well. The DHS, the OSI (Office of Special Investigations), the NSA, the IRS, the FBI, and the CIA would have been investigating her as being a potential "domestic extremist."
So what did she say? "You know, you might want to look into this Sir, because I think maybe Rush Limbaugh was the 20th hijacker (on Sept 11, 2001) but he was just so strung out on Oxycontin he missed his flight."
Could you imagine a Conservative saying that about the Obamessiah? That Conservative would never get out of legal trouble. Every three-letter government agency would look at our hypothetical Conservative. But Ms. Sykes is a Democrat, and a liberal, so what the hell, right?
But that's not all she said: "Rush Limbaugh 'I hope the country fails' - I hope his kidneys fail, how about that?"
But let's correct this: Mr Limbaugh said that he hopes the Obamessiah's policies fail, something that I also believe he should not have said. Why? Because if they do fail, then this country will be in an even deeper hole than the Obamessiah has dug for us. And yes, that could be taken to mean that Mr Limbaugh hopes the country fails.
But then Ms Sykes says "I hope his [Rush Limbaugh's] kidneys fail, how about that?" Again, she's a liberal Democrat, so what the hell right?
Let's take our hypothetical Conservative saying the same thing. Remember the OKC man who had his anti-Obamessiah sign taken away, and his house searched (with his permission, and the anti-Obamessiah sign was returned later.) What did that man's sign say? "Abort Obama." That could be taken as a death threat, you see. This is something that the Department of Hussein's Sycophants takes very seriously. And if our hypothetical Conservative were to wish the Obamessiah's kidneys would fail...well. Every government agency would investigate our hypothetical person. A new one would be created just to track him (or her.) He or she would get their own satellite.
But Ms Sykes, this liberal democrat, hopes that Mr Limbaugh's kidneys fail. But this is not a death threat, you see? Nor is it wishing Mr Limbaugh ill. She's a liberal Democrat, so what the hell, right?
What the hell, right?
Sen. Kennedy: "Free Speech for everyone, Al; regardless of ideology." "...regardless of ideology." Yes, that stalwart of liberalism, Mr Kennedy himself said that. "...regardless of ideology."
But if a Conservative paints a sign that says "Abort Obama," he gets harassed. If we disagree with the Obamessiah's porkulus, we get labelled "potential extremists."
Free speech? Only if you're a liberal.
HEY - DEPARTMENT OF HUSSEIN'S SYCOPHANTS, INVESTIGATE ME! I'm speaking out against his holiness (in his own mind) the Obamessiah!
And if you don't like it: "Free speech for everyone, Al; regardless of ideology." If you don't like it, well. Remember that movie Major League? It was that one scene inside Lynn's boyfriend's apartment when he tells Tom Berenger's character "Stay away from her (meaning Lynn.)" And Tom Berenger's character replies: "Suck my d*ck."
And I don't mean duck, or deck, or dock.
Thursday, May 7, 2009
The Book: "Animal Spirits"
CORRECTED at 21:25pm on 7-MAY to correct spelling of "trillion." Also corrected figure which was "one-half of one per cent" which I incorrectly stated was 0.05. In reality, this figure should read 0.5
Before I begin, I do know that Native Americans have Animal Spirits, also called "Spirit Guides," and that these Guides come to them in dream or trance-like states. I am not refering to these Animal Spirits.
No, I'm referring to the book, which had its 2nd printing back in the 1920's. Here's a link: http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2009/02/animals-spirits.html You'll notice that the title is "Animal Sprits, The Economy, Propaganda."
I think you should read this book. Why?
Because Barack Hussein Obama's White House is. Seriously.
The book is about the theory that there is a sure-fire way to control something that is otherwise un-controllable. And that is controlling the economy through the use of propaganda. If you think I'm "...making shit up..." for my "...worthless blog..." well, you're about to be proven wrong yet again. Google it, you'll find it.
Controlling the economy through propaganda. All you need to do is say something like what's on the Drudge Report right now, that we've hit bottom. Note that Mr Drudge did not say that, he linked to a story that said it. All you have to say is "Yes, we can!" and that things are getting better because the Obamessiah has said so.
And if you buy into that, that's akin to rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic as she's sinking beneath the waves.
But let's take another example, shall we? OK. The Obamessiah's budget is $3.4 trillion. Here's that number - $3,400,000,000,000.00 This was after he "saved" is 17billion. So before his "savings," that number would read $3.417 or $3,417.000,000,000.00 He says it's a lot of money, and it is. But let's look at the percentage, shall we?
0.5% Seriously.
But do you remember back during the start of the 2008 election? The Democrats (including you Mr Barack Hussein Obama) were saying that President Bush's budget was "unsustainable." You yourself said this Mr Obama.
To bring your porkget into a "sustainable" area, you'd have to mulitply your "savings" times 40. Honestly.
17billion times 40 = $680,000,000,000
or $680 BILLION. You yourself said this Mr Obamessiah.
Now I know I've been telling the truth and saying very unflattering things about you Mr Obamessiah. Perhaps you'll tell Janet Napolitano to have some of her people from the Departmant of Hussein's Sychophants label me a "potential extremeist" ... in other words a domestic terrorist. Perhaps you'll have her have them arrest me for telling the truth.
I'll make it easy for you (and her) - You have spent over $800,000 in lawsuits to avoid producing the vault copy of your birth certificate. That is a fact.
Now you, Mr Obamessiah, can convict me for revealing state secrets.
To those reading, I'm going to say this again: My problem with Mr Obama is not the colour of his skin. I think it would be wonderful to have an African-American President. Alan Keyes, however, didn't win. Neither did J.C. Watts. General Colin Powell wasn't running. Dr. Condolezza Rice wasn't running either, and since she's a woman, that would've removed the gender card from play as well.
My problem is the Obamessiah. We're not sure he's even eligible ... remember that $800,000 he's spent so far to avoid producing the vault copy of his birth cerficiate? Guess where a portion of that money has come from? Google it, you'll find it.
I guess that makes me a potential domestic extremeist.
BUT...remember the book "Animal Spirits?" What was one of the ways to control people?
Propaganda. We're certainly seeing that, aren't we?
Which brings us to disgraced Hillary fund-raiser Normal Hsu, who just plead guilty, guilty, guilty, guilty, guilty, guilty, guilty, guilty, guilty, and guilty to ten counts of mail and wire fraud.
Take a guess who was the #4 recipient of Mr Hsu's funny money? That'd be you Mr Obamessiah. Here's that link: http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pI5QkfhRBwUgAiaAQVTXffw&gid=0
Oddly enough, Ms Brunner, the Ohio Secretary of State, who refused to investigate ACORN after they dumped 600,000 "questionable" voter registrations ... received $3,000 from Mr Hsu. Mr Obama, you'll remember, was once part of ACORN.
The money really don't fall far from the tree, does it Mr Obamessiah?
Before I begin, I do know that Native Americans have Animal Spirits, also called "Spirit Guides," and that these Guides come to them in dream or trance-like states. I am not refering to these Animal Spirits.
No, I'm referring to the book, which had its 2nd printing back in the 1920's. Here's a link: http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2009/02/animals-spirits.html You'll notice that the title is "Animal Sprits, The Economy, Propaganda."
I think you should read this book. Why?
Because Barack Hussein Obama's White House is. Seriously.
The book is about the theory that there is a sure-fire way to control something that is otherwise un-controllable. And that is controlling the economy through the use of propaganda. If you think I'm "...making shit up..." for my "...worthless blog..." well, you're about to be proven wrong yet again. Google it, you'll find it.
Controlling the economy through propaganda. All you need to do is say something like what's on the Drudge Report right now, that we've hit bottom. Note that Mr Drudge did not say that, he linked to a story that said it. All you have to say is "Yes, we can!" and that things are getting better because the Obamessiah has said so.
And if you buy into that, that's akin to rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic as she's sinking beneath the waves.
But let's take another example, shall we? OK. The Obamessiah's budget is $3.4 trillion. Here's that number - $3,400,000,000,000.00 This was after he "saved" is 17billion. So before his "savings," that number would read $3.417 or $3,417.000,000,000.00 He says it's a lot of money, and it is. But let's look at the percentage, shall we?
0.5% Seriously.
But do you remember back during the start of the 2008 election? The Democrats (including you Mr Barack Hussein Obama) were saying that President Bush's budget was "unsustainable." You yourself said this Mr Obama.
To bring your porkget into a "sustainable" area, you'd have to mulitply your "savings" times 40. Honestly.
17billion times 40 = $680,000,000,000
or $680 BILLION. You yourself said this Mr Obamessiah.
Now I know I've been telling the truth and saying very unflattering things about you Mr Obamessiah. Perhaps you'll tell Janet Napolitano to have some of her people from the Departmant of Hussein's Sychophants label me a "potential extremeist" ... in other words a domestic terrorist. Perhaps you'll have her have them arrest me for telling the truth.
I'll make it easy for you (and her) - You have spent over $800,000 in lawsuits to avoid producing the vault copy of your birth certificate. That is a fact.
Now you, Mr Obamessiah, can convict me for revealing state secrets.
To those reading, I'm going to say this again: My problem with Mr Obama is not the colour of his skin. I think it would be wonderful to have an African-American President. Alan Keyes, however, didn't win. Neither did J.C. Watts. General Colin Powell wasn't running. Dr. Condolezza Rice wasn't running either, and since she's a woman, that would've removed the gender card from play as well.
My problem is the Obamessiah. We're not sure he's even eligible ... remember that $800,000 he's spent so far to avoid producing the vault copy of his birth cerficiate? Guess where a portion of that money has come from? Google it, you'll find it.
I guess that makes me a potential domestic extremeist.
BUT...remember the book "Animal Spirits?" What was one of the ways to control people?
Propaganda. We're certainly seeing that, aren't we?
Which brings us to disgraced Hillary fund-raiser Normal Hsu, who just plead guilty, guilty, guilty, guilty, guilty, guilty, guilty, guilty, guilty, and guilty to ten counts of mail and wire fraud.
Take a guess who was the #4 recipient of Mr Hsu's funny money? That'd be you Mr Obamessiah. Here's that link: http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pI5QkfhRBwUgAiaAQVTXffw&gid=0
Oddly enough, Ms Brunner, the Ohio Secretary of State, who refused to investigate ACORN after they dumped 600,000 "questionable" voter registrations ... received $3,000 from Mr Hsu. Mr Obama, you'll remember, was once part of ACORN.
The money really don't fall far from the tree, does it Mr Obamessiah?
Article: "White House Cheat Sheet: Sifting Through the Specter Damage"
The Link: http://voices.washingtonpost.com/thefix/cheat-sheet/050709white-house-cheat-sheet.html
I'm only going to quote this small bit: "While most party switchers are almost certainly guided by personal political concerns (what politician isn't?), most don't come right out and say it because it is a turnoff for voters who want to believe that their politicians believe in, well, something."
The writer means, I think, other than themselves. We've seen where "Benedict Arnold" Specter's priorities lay - in keeping his fat arse in Wa$hington, the Di$trict of Corruption. Whatever happened to going to Wa$hington to ... oh ... serve the people that put you there? Call me naive if you must ... and that that doesn't happen except in only a perfect world.
Tell me that, and I'll tell you that you are part of the problem for accepting the situation the way it is. The pols won't change as long as they know you'll sit on your butts and say "well, that's just the way it is."
I'm only going to quote this small bit: "While most party switchers are almost certainly guided by personal political concerns (what politician isn't?), most don't come right out and say it because it is a turnoff for voters who want to believe that their politicians believe in, well, something."
The writer means, I think, other than themselves. We've seen where "Benedict Arnold" Specter's priorities lay - in keeping his fat arse in Wa$hington, the Di$trict of Corruption. Whatever happened to going to Wa$hington to ... oh ... serve the people that put you there? Call me naive if you must ... and that that doesn't happen except in only a perfect world.
Tell me that, and I'll tell you that you are part of the problem for accepting the situation the way it is. The pols won't change as long as they know you'll sit on your butts and say "well, that's just the way it is."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
