Saturday, July 16, 2011

Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee pulls out the Race card

The link:

Yes, you got it. In what’s got to be a record time (.000000000000000317 seconds,) Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (D-Texas) reached for the … you guessed it … RACE card!

“ “Why is he [Mr Obama] different? And in my community, that is the question that we raise. In the minority community that is [the] question that is being raised. Why is this president being treated so disrespectfully?”

Let’s see: There’s his Communist, Socialist, and Marxist ‘czars’, the ‘stimulus’ that we were told would keep the unemployment rate no higher than 8 per cent (it’s currently at 9.2, but I digress,) there were the ‘shovel-ready’ projects that even he had to admit weren’t quite as ‘shovel-ready’ as he’d hoped, Van Jones, his ‘green jobs czar’ was a self-confessed COMMUNIST who co-founded a group built upon Marxist ideas, the bailout of GM, the bailout of Fannie, the bailout of Freddie, the TARP [Troubled Asset Relief Program [the bailout of the banks] ] his friendship with Bill Ayers the unrepentant TERRORIST whose group bombed government buildings, his past association with ACORN which during the 2008 election was under investigation for voter registration FRAUD in 14 states, need I go on?

John Holdren, the science czar is in favour of forced abortions and mass sterilization. In fact, he co-wrote a book named “Eco-Science: Population, Resources, Environment” (*)

The Apollo Alliance, who according to Harry Reid [D-Nevada] helped write the stimulus bill. One of their leaders, Jeff Jones, was another founder of the Weather Underground – the same terrorist group as Bill Ayers.

Then there’s Cass Sunstein, the regulatory czar, who proposed bans on hunting and eating meat. Not to outdo himself, but he also suggested that your dog be allowed to have an attorney in court. And then there’s his “Fairness Doctrine” for the Internet. Yes, if you criticize the President, or government then you need to be investigated. His words, folks.

Carol Browner, the global warming czar, was a member of Socialists International. They are a group in favour of global government. (**)

So, Mr Obama’s had pretty close run-ins with a COMMUNIST and TWO TERRORISTS. But I’m RAAAAAAAAAAACIST for pointing this out.

“Jackson Lee concluded by saying that she hoped someone would step up and say that what appears obvious to her is not in fact true. “

Ms Jackson Lee, I’ve been saying this since before the election. But since you and others like you have deluded yourselves into making me a “racist” then I must not count, right?

But let me ask this: How many Marxists, Communists, Socialists do you have around you?

How many times do we need to find a Marxist, Communist, Socialist, TERRORIST around the President before we get madder than hell and Impeach him?

But remember, I’m the one with the problems.

(*) -
(**) -

Friday, July 15, 2011

The Democrat's Playbook

NOTE: This is my second posting of this. The first time, Blogspit (yes, I meant to type that) ate it, saying there was an ‘editing conflict.’ Oddly enough, the last time it happened, my last posting, was also highly critical of the Campaigner-in-Thief. But this is Google that owns Blogspit, so it isn’t too surprising.

The Democrat’s playbook has a number of oft-used cards in it. Two of the key ones are, of course, the race card and the gender card. If we attend Tea Party protests, or even agree with them, the Democrat’s only answer is that we’re RAAAACISTS!!! To them, there’s no other possible answer.

Remember Janeane Garofalo on MSNBC speaking about the Tea Party Movement? She herself said it. “Let's be very honest about what this is about. This is not about bashing Democrats. It's not about taxes. They have no idea what the Boston Tea Party was about. They don't know their history at all. It's about hating a black man in the White House. That is racism straight up. This is nothing but a bunch of teabagging rednecks.[21] “ (Links are Wikipedia’s and are left intact.)

So, according to her, I don’t know my history, and the reason I dislike Mr Obama is because he’s black. Well, it’s so very nice to know that Ms Garofalo knows what’s in my mind and my heart. She can conceive of no other possible answer. It’s not because I dislike Mr Obama’s policies, again according to her. It’s not because he’s surrounded himself with socialists and Marxists (a la Van Jones, a self-confessed Communist) it simply must be, again according to her, because he’s black.

There is a word for that. But first, the definition from “a fixed false belief that is resistant to reason or confrontation with actual fact: a paranoid delusion”

Yes, the word is delusional. Note that I’m not calling her a name, I’m describing her reasoning. Yes, the first part certainly fits, doesn’t it? The race card has been debunked how many times now? Yet they still reach for it. Believe it or not, but they’re part of the problem too.

Expect more of that this election. If we don’t vote for Mr Obama (again) it’s simply (again) because we’re RAAAAACIST!!!

But you know it won’t end there. If Ms Bachmann were a Democrat and we didn’t vote for her, it’s simply because we’re sexist. Again, this is according to the liberals. I was told that the reason I didn’t like Ms Clinton was because she’s a woman. Actually, I don’t like her policies, and then there’s her baggage (er…husband) Bill. I’d have no problem with a woman being the President, as long as I agreed with her positions. For the record, I would’ve voted for Dr Condoleezza Rice, had she been running. And since she’s also African-American, that takes both your favourite cards off the table. Time to put those tired old cards away.

Seriously, don’t you hate being told you’re something that you’re not? I hate being called a racist, it’s been disproven repeatedly, yet they can conceive of no other answer. Oh, and it’s because my heart’s filled with hate. ::sigh::

Another of the Democrat’s favourite cards is to demagogue. Mr Obama reached for that card today during his press conference. Yes, according to him, it’s going to be “Armageddon” unless we raise the debt ceiling. Didn’t he himself say that Social Security cheques might not go out? That’s been disproven, too. Yet he still reached for the demagogue card. According to a new poll, only 34 per cent of Americans want higher taxes. But in Mr Obama’s own little world, 80 per cent do. ::sigh:: He can conceive of no other option, other than to raise taxes. The solution, however, is simple. Cut spending and live within your means. It’s not rocket science. It really isn’t.

So we’ve got
The Race Card
The Gender (sexist) Card
The Demagogue Card

Now it’s time to add another. I’m calling this one the “Name-Calling” or “Idiot” card. Yes, according to the liberals, I’m simply not smart enough to comprehend what Mr Obama’s trying to do. Didn’t he himself say that he should’ve done a better job explaining the stimulus? In other words “I need to use smaller and simpler words because the people are too damn dumb to know what I’m trying to do. It’s their fault!”

Aren’t you tired of seeing that card as well? “Well, you’re too dumb.” Oh, and then they belittle you. Disparage also works. Just to be certain that the meaning hadn’t changed overnight, I went to Still means the same.

Monday, July 11, 2011

VIDEO: "Obama Would Rather Be Talking About NFL Lockout Over Debt Crisis"

The link:

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!! Say it ain't so, O!

" "We are not out here trying to use this as a means of doing all these really tough political things. I would rather be talking about stuff that everybody welcomes like new programs or the NFL season getting resolved. " (emphasis and colour added)

Now how about it, Obamabots? (*)

(*) -


The link:

" LOS ANGELES (CBS) — More stores across the U.S. that offer deeply-discounted products are seeing their sales decline after years of growth amid America’s “Great Recession” — and one analyst said on Monday it’s another sign of even deeper downturn. "

The article states (further down) that rising food and transportation (fuel) costs are causing prices at the stores to rise. Think of it this way: The food you buy didn't get to the store by itself, did it? Of course not; It was brought there in a truck. And that truck used fuel to bring it from the farm (or factory). And that farm (or factory) used fuel also.

So; they're right. But they're part of the same problem. It's part of a cause and effect cycle - a chain of events.

CAUSE: The price of oil is higher.
EFFECT: The price of petrol (gasoline) is higher.
EFFECT: The farm (or factory) must spend more for fuel.
EFFECT: Prices at the store rise as they pass off the higher costs to consumers.

I don't think even Obama's chief water-carrier Keith Olbermann could dispute this chain of events. Although he and Janeane Garofalo would quickly say it's "RAAAAAAAAAAACIST" to point it out.

Seriously, you two. I've bebunked that race card how many times now? Yet you continue to reach for it. Believe it or not, but you have become part of the problem.

You can't dispute the facts so you call names, belittle people, or call them racists. You are therefore part of the problem. And so am I.

Be very careful here: for if you immediately dismiss it without considering it, you're saying that you are perfect.

And nobody is perfect.

Believe it or not, but your 'chosen one' is also part of the problem. Yes, he did inherit a bad situation from Mr Bush, but come on now. How far into Mr Obama's presidency are we? And things haven't gotten better, they've gotten worse.

Is it just barely possible that he also bears blame? Be very careful here.

" “In other words, the economy is continuing to be worse, the Obama depression continues to explode,” he [top retail analyst Howard Davidowitz] added. (emphasis, colour, and italics added)

Quick: Department of Hussein's Sycophants (DHS) investigate the paper and writer! They've obviously racists for saying it. Mr Olbermann and Ms Garofalo have said so.

Saturday, July 9, 2011

MSNBC and "Lean Forward"

First, a few links:


" Following several years in which many observers noted a politically progressive shift in the channel's programming, MSNBC publicly acknowledged its progressivism in October 2010 while launching a marketing campaign with the tagline "Lean Forward." [9][10][11][12][13][14][15] In a June 2011 interview, MSNBC president Phil Griffin stated that "MSNBC has established a sensibility, a position, a platform" and that "MSNBC is really the place to go for progressives."[16] " (Links are Wikipedia's and are left intact.)

Here, we learn that MSNBC had publicly acknowledged its "...progressivism..." which Wikipedia defines as "...a political attitude favoring or advocating changes or reform through governmental action."

I'll be the first to admit that some government control is a good thing. For example, I wouldn't want various states in the United States to have nuclear weapons. Alaska and Texas, for example, really don't like each other. Therefore, could you imagine what might have happened if, when the Wichita Falls Wildcats and the University of Anchorage SeaWolves played in Anchorage, a Rustlers fan just happened to have a small nuke with him?

Let's further assume that this match took place in January (For the record, I do know that these two teams played in Anchorage, but not when.)

It can get really cold in Anchorage in January. And it really doesn't get all that cold in Wichita Falls. Therefore, a Texan brings a nuke with him not to do damage, but rather, to get warm.

For a reason like that (I know, a stupid one) having a central government is a good idea.

But not everything can be solved by a centralized government. Some problems are best handled at the local or state level.

But then we come to MSNBC which now embraces its progressivism ... which could also be called liberalism. Question: Haven't they in fact turned themselves from a news organization into a cheerleader? Another question: Don't they themselves say that Fox News isn't a news organization but a wing of the Republican Party? Therefore, by their own reasoning: haven't they become a wing of the Democratic Party, and specifically the Obama Administration?

Remember when MSNBC, in the midst of showing tsunami damage in Japan, thought that was a good time to remind its viewers that Obama was born in Hawaii? Question: What the hell does the tsunami in Japan have to do with where Obama was born??

MSNBC is the place to go for progressives. Phil Griffin said that. So much for being a valid news organization.

Monday, July 4, 2011

Article about "Stimulus"

The link:

" When the Obama administration releases a report on the Friday before a long weekend, it’s clearly not trying to draw attention to the report’s contents. Sure enough, the “Seventh Quarterly Report” on the economic impact of the “stimulus,” released on Friday, July 1, provides further evidence that President Obama’s economic “stimulus” did very little, if anything, to stimulate the economy, and a whole lot to stimulate the debt. " (Links are theirs and are left intact.)

That's actually quite telling. So the "stimulus" didn't really stimulate the economy. It did stimulate the debt, however.

I'm about to be called a racist again for pointing that out. And I'm really really tired of it.

I honest to God don't understand why people have to keep calling me a racist when it's absolutely not true. My problem with Barack Obama isn't because he's African-American, my problem with him is his policies. My other problem with Mr Obama is the people he associates with.

Case in point: Van Jones.

Case in point: Bill Ayers.

Case in point: Ms Kagan.

Case in point: You get the idea.