Article: Nearly 1 out of every 3 new Ohio "Voters" has problems.

The link: http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D93R8IE00&show_article=1

"CINCINNATI (AP) - Close to one in every three newly registered Ohio voters will end up on court-ordered lists being sent to county election boards because they have some discrepancy in their records, an elections spokesman said Wednesday. "

Ohio Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner (a Democrat) estimated that 200,000 of the newly registered 666,000 voters have "...some discrepancy in their records..."

Let's see ... 200,000 / 666,000 = 0.3003003003003003003003003003003 or 30%. ::BLINK::

To be fair, some of these could easily be misspellings, or people simply chosing to register under a different version of their name. For example, "Billy Jones" could register as "William Jones." To be certain, some of those 200k do fall under this category.

To also be fair, however; the odds against all of those 200k being misspellings and/or different versions, while not-quite-zero, is very VERY high. Statistically speaking, you have a better chance at winning $200 million in PowerBall and then winning another $200 million the very next time you play. Again, statistically speaking. It's not statistically impossible, but I wouldn't bet the farm on it happening.

Given what we know about ACORN, their 10-year pattern of voter fraud, and given the fact that they are being investigated in 14 states: Given all that, the odds of every single one of those 200k being fraudulent?

1 in 7. Statistically speaking.

With 1 in 7 odds, I'd play the lottery every single time.

Ms Brunner said (quoting from the article) : "Brunner, a Democrat, told The (Cleveland) Plain Dealer on Wednesday that she is concerned the court decision is a veiled attempt at disenfranchising voters. Brunner said she'll urge counties not to force these people to use provisional ballots."

"...a veiled attempt at disenfranchising voters." Such as the young man that ACORN registered 73 times? How about all those people who registered from the same house? How about those people who weren't eligible to vote to begin with?

Ms Brunner, I'd call your scheme an attempt to throw the election.

"Their Facebook page brags: “Want to turn the Presidential election blue in a key swing state? Vote from Home is a political organization that was founded by a team of young people for the purpose of assisting, aiding, and tracking voters to elect progressive candidates to the White House. Encouraged by the excitement of the 2008 elections and the movement around the Democratic candidates, Vote From Home will be in Ohio seeking to deliver 10,000 votes to Democratic candidates statewide.” LINK: http://michellemalkin.com/2008/10/15/voter-fraud-alert-houseful-of-out-of-state-obama-activists-registered-as-ohio-voters-received-absentee-ballots/

"Want to turn the Presidential election blue in a key swing state?" AKA - Let's throw the election.