The US Supreme Court

First, a link: http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D93SBR781&show_article=1

(And yes, a "vote early for Barack" advert is on the bottom of the page. ::sigh:: )

"In a brief unsigned opinion, the justices said they were not commenting on whether Ohio is complying with a provision of the Help America Vote Act of 2002 that lays out requirements for verifying voter eligibility.

Instead, they said they were granting Brunner's request because it appears that the law does not allow private entities, like the Ohio GOP, to file suit to enforce the provision of the law at issue."

So if a "...private entity..." can't force a Democrat to do her job, who will? Ms Brunner is saying that the Republicans are trying to disenfranchise voters.

Like that same young man that ACORN pressured into registering 72 times? Ms Brunner? How about it?

Like those out-of-state activists who falsely registered as Ohioans? Ms Brunner?

Ms Brunner, is it just barely possible that you might be trying to "throw" the election?

Ms Brunner?

Ms Brunner, how do you justify the fact that 200,000 of the 666,000 "new voter registrations" have some type of discrepancy, according to your own office? Ms Brunner?

Ms Brunner, it appears that a crime may have been committed. All I want are the facts. Now how about it?

(H/T: Drudge Report)